Everyone starts at 0.0 — the score measures progress from baseline, never starting physique. Ranked by Overall Challenge Score = 45% SMM + 40% Body Fat + 15% Visceral, each as % of that competitor's own target. Tap any competitor for the full breakdown.
TARGET ACHIEVEMENT % of each man's own target — the only fair comparison
A 167 cm and a 189 cm competitor compete on identical terms here. Bars fill as monthly scans arrive.
THE ASSIGNMENT how much transformation each man signed up for
HOW TRANSFORMATION QUALITY IS READ muscle change vs fat change
SCORE BREAKDOWN
TREND HISTORY baseline plotted · gold flag = year-end target · dashed = guide, not a measurement
SCORE BREAKDOWN
TREND HISTORY baseline plotted · gold flag = year-end target · dashed = guide, not a measurement
SCORE BREAKDOWN
TREND HISTORY baseline plotted · gold flag = year-end target · dashed = guide, not a measurement
SCORE BREAKDOWN
TREND HISTORY baseline plotted · gold flag = year-end target · dashed = guide, not a measurement
SCORE BREAKDOWN
TREND HISTORY baseline plotted · gold flag = year-end target · dashed = guide, not a measurement
SCORE BREAKDOWN
TREND HISTORY baseline plotted · gold flag = year-end target · dashed = guide, not a measurement
SCORE BREAKDOWN
TREND HISTORY baseline plotted · gold flag = year-end target · dashed = guide, not a measurement
SCORE BREAKDOWN
TREND HISTORY baseline plotted · gold flag = year-end target · dashed = guide, not a measurement
SCORE BREAKDOWN
TREND HISTORY baseline plotted · gold flag = year-end target · dashed = guide, not a measurement
SCORE BREAKDOWN
TREND HISTORY baseline plotted · gold flag = year-end target · dashed = guide, not a measurement
Steps & active calories sync automatically from each competitor's phone. This is tracked and celebrated but does not affect the monthly body-composition Challenge Score.
THE FORMULA
Score = 0.45·SMM% + 0.40·BodyFat% + 0.15·Visceral%. Each % is target achievement = actual progress ÷ required progress. Hitting every target = 100. Below target scales linearly; a regression goes negative (floored at −50% of a component).
ABOVE TARGET
Past 100% you keep scoring, with diminishing returns: muscle slope 0.50 (cap 140%), fat 0.25 (cap 115%), visceral 0.40 (cap 130%). Muscle over-delivery is rewarded more than extra fat loss, so no lean competitor is pushed to cut dangerously low.
MAINTENANCE (MATARY)
A “hold” target scores no points at baseline. Fat-side credit is gated by SMM progress and modulated by staying in-band: full credit only when the SMM target is reached while ≤12% / ≤3 is held. Drift above the band erodes it.
LEADERBOARD & TIES
Rank by Overall Score. Ties break by SMM% → fat% → visceral% → more valid scans. Exact ties share a rank. At baseline all competitors are T1 — shown as “no ranking yet” rather than a false order.
QUALITY CONTROL & NOISE
A warning layer flags muscle loss, dirty gain and clean recomp — it never changes the score. Changes under InBody test variation (SMM 0.3 kg, BF 0.4 pt) show as steady, so hydration swings aren't read as wins. Raw data is never smoothed.
WEIGHT & CONTEXT
Weight, BMI, fat mass and InBody score are tracked for context and shown in steel — they never generate competition points. This is a recomposition challenge, not a weigh-in.
Same engine as the printable edition. Individualized targets are fixed benchmarks and were not altered.